With Google Reader nearing its imminent death, a race to build the perfect alternative for the service's refugees has been taking shape over the last few weeks. Even though there are dozens of alternatives already out there, if you care about cross-platform compatibility and synchronization across different devices for things like read and favorited items, then your options are a little more limited than you'd imagine.

Local Sync Versus Server-based RSS

If you access your news feed from a single device, then in theory any standalone app capable of fetching RSS should suffice. However, this scenario poses some limitations even if you don't need to sync devices.

Due to the way most RSS feeds work, only the last few articles will be downloaded, rather than every new story since you last checked. That means the only way to make sure you are not missing out on anything is to have the app running in the background at all times, which is hardly an ideal scenario.

On the other hand, server-based RSS services like Google Reader frequently poll feeds for new articles, downloading everything that's available and keeping it in their local database. That way whenever you access the service, from your browser or any mobile or desktop app that connects to it, you will be able to catch up on all new articles from all your subscriptions regardless of the last time of synchronization.

Does RSS Even Matter Anymore?

Google feels RSS is no longer as important as it used to considering how the average internet user receives his fix of interesting links and news via social networks -- most of the time not through their social network, though.

But for millions of professionals that need that constant stream of information, from manually selected sources rather than algorithms or shared links, RSS is a big deal. Journalists, bloggers, programmers, researchers, students, tech savvy people, among others, fall into this group. It's a niche product, but still a big niche.

What Should I Do?

First things first: if you are a Google Reader user and want to keep all your data intact, you'll need to export everything before July 1 (that means we are mere hours away). Head over to Google Takeout's Reader page and click on “Create Archive” -- it might take a couple of minutes. Once it's done save the resulting zip file.

Now, on to the alternatives. Here are a handful of services we're keeping our eye on:

Top free(mium) contenders

Feedly

Feedly is probably the most popular and well rounded Google Reader alternative out there, due in part because it's been developed for years and didn't just sprung up after the Google Reader announcement. That said, since news of the closure got out they've been working on new features like crazy and preparing for the influx of incoming users. Among other things, they launched their own sync server, a one-click migration tool, made UI tweaks, added a ton of hardware to their backend, and designed an open API for third party apps to tap into.

If you prefer a 'native' experience, Feedly also has its own iOS and Android apps in addition to the web client. All in all, they've moved at an impressive pace which is a testament to their ability to iterate and scale.

Still missing: search functionality.

Available on: Web, official iOS and Android apps, IFTTT, Sprout Social, Nextgen Reader, gNewsReader forBlackBerry 10 and for Symbian/MeeGo, Press, gReader, Newsify, Pure News Widget, Meneré, and Reeder foriPhone -- Mac and iPad Reeder clients will be added later.

Digg Reader

Digg Reader is still very much in development but the team behind it has been racing to have the core RSS reading functionality ready in time for Google Reader's shutdown. At time of writing only users who applied for the beta have been given access but invites are rolling out quickly for those just signing up.

It features a clean and familiar interface with support for the same Google Reader keyboard shortcuts, as well as options to save stories to 'read later' services or share them on social networks. There's also a popular filter that shows you which articles in your feeds are trending and a laundry list of promised upcoming features.

Still missing: search functionality, API for third-party app support (they are working on it), unread-only view.

Available on: Web, official iOS app (iPhone and iPad), official Android app coming "in a few weeks".

Honorable Mentions

AOL is developing yet another Reader alternative and the initial impression is that it's stripped down, simple, and fast. They are also promising an open API for developers to build their own apps around it... pity it's just hard to like AOL. For a web-only, no-frills RSS reader newsvibe might be worth a look.

Solid Paid Alternatives

Some people argue that paid is better than free for services you rely upon day in and day out because you know developers are being taken care off, and they won't just shut down on you one random day -- much like the free Google Reader, although a lack of funds is certainly not to blame here. On the other hand, free alternatives didn't take long to crop up, so it wasn't exactly the end of the world. A minor inconvenience at most.

Feedbin

Feedbin is another new entrant featuring a clean interface and most of the basic controls of Google Reader. You can bundle feed sources into groups with 'tag drawers', it has a couple of view options, has built in sharing functionality, and let's you use keyboard shortcuts to move between posts, star items, mark them as read or unread, and more. The web interface is pretty straightforward and although there are no mobile apps, there are several third-party app powered by its API to keep everything synchronized. The service costs $2 per month.

Still missing: search functionality, few layout options -- though there's not much wrong with the default view.

Available on: Web, Reeder for iPhone, Mr. Reader for iPad, ReadKit, Press, Slow Feeds, Favs, Tafiti, Readlines for Feedbin, Bulletin for Feedbin, Feedbin Reader beta, and Deer Reader.

Newsblur

Newsblur has been around for a while but, like others on this round up, it has received several updates and a huge influx of new users over the past two months. Even though it was recently redesigned it doesn't look as pretty as its competitors. In fact, the user interface looks a little busy, but that's because it has a hefty feature set which some may consider a fair tradeoff.

Among it's unique features is a discovery algorithm that users can train to surface stories they like and bury those that they find less interesting. There's also a sharing feature called Blurblogs that let's you subscribe to other's feeds much like Google Reader's sharing functionality.

NewsBlur costs $24 a year and has apps for the iPad, iPhone, and Android. Like with the web client, beautiful design is not a strong point here and though there is an API open to developers, third-party app support is very limited. There's a free option that limits you to 64 feeds, which would be enough for plenty of people, but it also limits the way stories are fetched so it's likely you'll miss some updates.

Still missing: no search, cluttered UI, fetch limitation on free tier can be a deal breaker.

Available on: Web, official iOS app (iPhone and iPad), Android, ReadKit.

Honorable Mentions

FeedWrangler is another worthy RSS reading and sync service that costs $19 a year and includes all the features you'd expect, but for now it's limited to OS X, iOS and Android. Another Mac-centric alternative isNetNewsWire, which has been out for ages but just recently received a much needed refresh. It'll cost you a one-time payment of $20 (though it's currently 50% off) but for now sync isn't ready yet.

Other less analogous alternatives

The above services step in more or less as direct replacements or alternatives to Google Reader, each offering a few differentiating traits without drifting apart too far from its formula. If you are willing to take the opportunity to try something different here are some services you might want to consider.

• Self-hosted RSS: If you'll grow anxious about another free service shutting its doors but don't want a subscription-based alternative, consider something like Tiny Tiny RSS or Fever. Both are full-fledged RSS readers and aggregators that you run from your own server and support mobile apps. The former is a free, open-source project while Fever is $30, but it has some clever ways of grouping and surfacing the most interesting content. You'll just have to deal with the extra work of setting things up.


• Magazine-style feeds: For a more visual, image-driven feed with a focus on content discovery (surfacing trending content from websites and social networks) try Flipboard, Pulse or Zite. All of them offer a mix of content from RSS feeds and social networks you connect to them for a more personalized experience.

Read More...

Online businesses often rely on advertising to bring in revenue. Unfortunately, when tracking the activity of users in an effort to drive targeted ads, the line between innocent observation and privacy violation begins to blur. The use of third-party cookies is one of the easiest ways for a company to learn more about prospective customers; something that Mozilla plans to tackle in an upcoming version of the Firefox browser.

Mozilla first announced the “Do Not Track” feature back in February, but later said that it had to undergo further testing. Despite the ongoing hiatus, the company continues to face backlash from the advertising community, with many claiming that this will have a negative impact on the entire online network. Mike Zaneis, general counsel for the Interactive Advertising Bureau, called the new browser a “nuclear first strike” against advertisers.

It’s important to note that Mozilla does not intend to block all cookies, just those that are deemed undesirable. After all, cookies can be beneficial and serve purposes such as remembering settings for sites that we frequently visit. The company has been working alongside the Center for Internet and Society (CIS) at Stanford to develop the list of websites whose data gathering priveleges will be axed; an initiative being called the “Cookie Clearinghouse”.

Aleecia McDonald, director of privacy at CIS, added, “The Cookie Clearinghouse will create, maintain and publish objective information. Web browser companies will be able to choose to adopt the lists we publish to provide new privacy options to their users.”

In response to the statement, advertisers argue that numerous online businesses, many of which are small web establishments, will cease to function if cookie-blocking browsers become the standard. However, this already seems to be the case; Apple's Safari browser carries a similar privacy feature, while Microsoft's IE10 has made the "Do Not Track" technology its default setting.  “It’s troubling,” added Lou Mastria, the managing director for the Digital Advertising Alliance. "They're putting this under the cloak of privacy, but it's disrupting a business model."

What are your thoughts on Mozilla’s new feature? Do cookie-blocking browsers pose a threat to the sustainability of the internet, or are ad agencies just trying to protect their own livelihood?

Read More...

After announcing a trio of Galaxy Tab devices over the last couple of months, Samsung is finally ready to share US availability and pricing details for the next generation of its tablets. In a nutshell, they’ll start at $199, $299 and $399 for the 7.0- , 8.0- and 10.1-inch models respectively, and will be available from retailers including Best Buy, Walmart, Amazon and others beginning on July 7, with pre-orders starting tomorrow June 25.

As a refresher, the entry-level Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 sports a dual-core 1.2GHz processor paired with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage. For anyone desiring more space there’s also a microSD expansion slot. Other than that you get a 7-inch 1,024 x 600 TFT display, front and rear-facing cameras at 1.3 and 3.0 megapixel respectively, Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, as well as Samsung's apps and built-in hubs.

The Galaxy Tab 3 8.0 bumps up the processor to an Exynos 1.5GHz dual-core, offers 1.5GB of RAM, and its 8-inch screen also improves resolution to 1,280 x 800. Base storage is doubled to 16GB while keeping the option to expand through microSD, and you’ll be running the latest Android 4.2 Jelly Bean release. A 5-megapixel rear camera and a 1.3-megapixel front camera round out the specifications sheet.

Lastly, the 10.1 inch model is perhaps the most intriguing of them all, due to the fact that it uses a 1.6-GHz Intel Atom Z2560 "Clover Trail+" processor. This will be the first Intel Android device released in the U.S.

The tablet features the same 1280 x 800 resolution as the 8-inch model, which means it has a lower PPI at 149, and as you might expect it sports a bigger 6,800 mAh battery to support the power demands of a larger screen.  It is also lacking next to its smaller sibling in a couple areas. It has 1GB of RAM, down from 1.5GB, and while its front facing camera is the same, the rear unit is only 3-megapixels.

On the upside it does include a built-in IR blaster as well as Samsung's WatchON TV recommendation service,  so you can use it to control your TV. It comes with Android 4.2, 16GB of memory and a microSD slot.

To sweeten the deal Samsung is including a $10 Google Play Store voucher, one free year of Boingo’s hotspot service, three months of Hulu Plus, and 50GB of free Dropbox storage for two years with all three models.

Read More...

Who knew that Google’s decision to shutter their RSS reader would spawn so many replacements? Since theannouncement back in March, we’ve seen several clones launch or promise to do so in the coming weeks. Now we can add AOL’s name to that growing list as the company launched their own reader earlier today.

AOL Reader, described as bringing all your favorite websites together in one place, is now available on the desktop as well as mobile devices. The service can easily import your entire Google Reader library and allows users to share content across social networks like Facebook, Google+ and Twitter.

Functionality to save articles for later and tag articles for archiving comes baked right in. Developers will appreciate an available API to facilitate the creation of third party apps.

To get started, you simply need to sign up using an AOL account. If you don’t already have one, you can create one free of charge beforehand. From there, you’ll be asked to add new subscriptions or import ones already in use from other services – like Google Reader. AOL offers multiple pre-selected categories to choose from that are already populated with poplar websites in that genre.

Naturally, you can add your own or remove others from the list at will. Once subscribed, new stories will appear in your feed with the most recent stories being shown first.

While there’s no doubt that many are sad to see Google Reader go, there’s also no denying the impact that it will have on the reader community as a whole. More options are always welcomed and with any luck, perhaps some new innovative features will stick and become commonplace.

Read More...

For a product that has yet to be released, Google’s Project Glass has definitely sparked an interest in wearable computing. In addition to their high-tech eyewear, the search giant is purportedly working on a phone-compatible smartwatch. On a similar note, rumor has it that Apple will soon announce plans for an Intel powered “iWatch”. But what few people realize is that smartwatches are not a new phenomenon – Sony has entered this niche before, and going by a tweet by the Sony Xperia division, they're set to release their third rendition of the device.

Accompanied by the hashtag #itstime, the tweet foreshadowed the watch’s release at the upcoming Mobile Asia Expo (MAE) being held next week in Shanghai. A follow up tweet also included a photo of the new hardware; something that closely resembles its predecessor from just a year ago. 

Unfortunately, the tweets are currently the only things we know about the new Sony product, but hopefully it will be a significant improvement over past models, dubbed the SmartWatch and LiveWare, respectively.

Sony's SmartWatch was able to connect with most Android phones and could display SMS, Twitter feeds, and it also offered convenient music controls. That being said, the devices were criticized for having a hard-to-follow interface, as well as difficulty with phone integration. Not to mention the fact that apps were of limited use, and at a price of $149.99 for the latest model, it was too expensive to be a novelty device.

However, with a newfound global interest in these type of devices, Sony might actually have the upper hand against Apple and Google. Neither one of them has dabbled in this space before, while Sony already has an existing product to build upon.

Read More...